AMT Sustainability · 全面可持续数字化

From “collecting Excels” to a “data network” — a paradigm shift

Regulation, markets and network effects are jointly pushing supply-chain carbon collaboration to a point of no return. Collecting forms one by one can no longer meet the demand for verifiable evidence chains.

Industry pain points

Anchor side

Scope 3 / EUDR / UFLPA & battery due diligence need upstream data, yet supplier response is low and quality uneven.

Supplier side

Refilling forms for every anchor (Excel / PDF / survey), wasting huge time on duplicate work.

Customer side

Downstream customers / brands demand traceable carbon & compliance data (for CSRD / EUDR / battery rules) but can rarely get trustworthy evidence.

Multi-sided network theory

Metcalfe’s law holds that network value grows with the square of participants. Card networks, operating systems and logistics networks are classic multi-sided platforms — and so is supply-chain carbon collaboration: the more anchors and suppliers join, the higher the data-reuse value of the whole network.

Value ∝ participants²
1 anchor × 100 suppliers100
10 anchors × 100 suppliers1,000
Supplier filingsalways 1

Industry trends

EU regulation

CSRD / EUDR / Battery / DPP land in succession, mandating verifiable evidence chains.

China policy

Dual-carbon goals / CCER restart / ETS expansion push full-chain carbon data.

Brand-led

CDP / SBTi / net-zero pledges demand transparent Scope 3 data.

Collaboration is the only sustainable answer